Whether the appellate court improperly substituted its own factual findings in place of a jury verdict

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Where the appellate court in this action substituted its own findings of fact in place of a jury verdict; and where it is undisputed that the jury was properly and precisely instructed as to the applicable law; and where the jury verdict was sustained by the district court after post-trial motions, should this Court enter an order granting, vacating and remanding in view of the identical or nearly identical question raised in the case already pending in this Court in Google, LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., No. 18-956 where the appellate court likewise displaced the jury’s factual findings. i