No. 20-904

Deborah Holter v. City of Mandan, North Dakota

Lower Court: North Dakota
Docketed: 2021-01-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: abuse-of-discretion due-process fourteenth-amendment governmental-action judicial-discretion property-rights special-assessment special-assessments takings village-of-norwood-v-baker
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings
Latest Conference: 2021-03-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a governmental entity properly considers the special benefits accruing to an assessed property when paying a nominal portion of the total costs of an improvement for which the remaining costs will be specially assessed against private properties

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. By paying a nominal portion of the total costs of an improvement for which the remaining costs will be specially assessed against private properties, does a governmental entity properly consider the special benefits accruing to an assessed property, as required by Village of Norwood v. Baker. 2. Does a state court of last resort commit an abuse of discretion and/or violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by deciding an appeal on issues or facts which were never raised by the parties and to which neither party was given the opportunity to respond.

Docket Entries

2021-03-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2020-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Deborah Holter
Gregory C. LarsonLarson Latham Huettl LLP, Petitioner
Gregory C. LarsonLarson Latham Huettl LLP, Petitioner