No. 20-905
Independent School District No. 283 v. E. M. D. H. ex rel. L. H. and S. D.
Tags: administrative-complaint administrative-procedure continuing-violation-doctrine education-law federal-circuit-split individuals-with-disabilities-education-act negative-consequences statutory-time-limit
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the continuing violation doctrine applies to the two-year statutory time limit to file an administrative complaint under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the continuing violation doctrine applies to the two-year statutory time limit to file an administrative complaint under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (i)
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-09-03
Supplemental brief of petitioner Independent School District No. 283 filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-23
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2021-05-03
The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-13
Reply of petitioner Independent School District No. 283 filed. (Distributed)
2021-03-25
Brief of respondent E.M.D.H. ex rel. L.H. and S.D. in opposition filed.
2021-02-11
Brief amici curiae of School Superintendents Association (ASSA, et al. filed.
2021-02-03
Brief amicus curiae of Minnesota Association of School Administrators filed.
2021-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 26, 2021
2021-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 24, 2021 to March 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-25
Response Requested. (Due February 24, 2021)
2021-01-13
Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent E.M.D.H. ex rel. L.H. and S.D. to respond filed.
2020-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2021)
Attorneys
E.M.D.H. ex rel. L.H. and S.D.
Roman Martinez V — Latham & Watkins, LLP, Respondent
Roman Martinez V — Latham & Watkins, LLP, Respondent
Amy Jane Goetz — School Law Center, LLC, Respondent
Amy Jane Goetz — School Law Center, LLC, Respondent
Independent School District No. 283
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Minnesota Association of School Administrators
Hyland Hunt — Deutsch Hunt PLLC, Amicus
Hyland Hunt — Deutsch Hunt PLLC, Amicus
National School Boards Association, et al.
Lucas Michael Walker — MoloLamken LLP, Amicus
Lucas Michael Walker — MoloLamken LLP, Amicus
School Superintendents Association (ASSA, Association of Educational Service Agencies (AESA), Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators (AAEA), Minnesota Administrators for Special Education (MASE)
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Amicus
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Amicus