No. 20-910

Anthony M. Lee v. Heath Parshall

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-rights due-process judicial-discretion jury jury-selection racial-bias section-1983 standing voir-dire
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court's refusal to probe potential jurors for bias or prejudice was an abuse of discretion under Rule 47(a)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This petition brings to the Court an issue for which there is substantial need for clear direction: a trial court’s obligation to obtain for litigants a jury free from bias; in this instance, racial and other biases in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. Through trial by jury, society pursues impartial justice. Through voir dire, jury trials pursue impartial jurors. The former, of course, hinging on the latter. The arc of the American story is wedded to this principle: impartial adjudication of disputes requires impartial adjudicators. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the district court’s refusal to probe potential jurors for bias or prejudice was an abuse of discretion under Rule 47(a). 2. Whether the district court’s questioning of the jurors was insufficient under the Due Process Clause.

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2020-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Anthony M. Lee
Robert John GingrasGingras, Thomsen & Wachs LLP, Petitioner
Robert John GingrasGingras, Thomsen & Wachs LLP, Petitioner