No. 20-920
Jeremy Collins v. Rebecca Putt, in Her Individual and Official Capacity, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: academic-freedom college-classroom college-speech constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech hazelwood-v-kuhlmeier tinker-standard tinker-v-des-moines viewpoint-discrimination
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-02-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether viewpoint discrimination in a college classroom is permissible under Hazelwood
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED oe 1. Whether or not viewpoint discrimination in a college classroom is permissible : under the Supreme Court's ruling in Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260. 2. Whether or not a college student's classroom speech is protected by the First Amendment and the Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503.
Docket Entries
2021-03-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent Rebecca Putt, et al. to respond filed.
2020-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Rebecca Putt, et al.
Mary K. Lenehan — Connecticut - Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Mary K. Lenehan — Connecticut - Office of the Attorney General, Respondent