No. 20-924
David G. Bowser v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 18-usc-1001 criminal-concealment dismissal-with-prejudice false-statement federal-rules-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judgment-of-acquittal legal-duty material-fact motion-for-judgment-of-acquittal
Key Terms:
Copyright Privacy
Copyright Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a legal duty to disclose can be created by coupling a voluntary request for information with a false statement proscription
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the legal duty to disclose, required for a criminal concealment of a material fact, 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1), can be created by coupling a voluntary request for information with a certification of compliance subject to the false statement proscription of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2)? Whether a defendant can obtain relief where a trial court, in violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 29 and 48, refuses to rule on a motion for judgment of acquittal and, over the defendant’s objection, instead permits the Government to dismiss the charge with prejudice?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 10, 2021)
Attorneys
David Bowser
Leslie Sue McAdoo Gordon — McAdoo Gordon & Associates, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent