Judy Knight v. Ward & Glass, et al.
DueProcess Securities
Whether the Court erred in denying Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Application to Exceed Page Limit
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Introduction: , On 5/23/2019 Petitioner filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time To File A Petition For Rehearing thought to be due on Saturday 6/1 ; (i.e. Monday 6/3) with attached Affidavit and an Application to Exceed the ' Page Limit. ‘Having known that more than 100 such extension requests had been allowed to attorneys in the underlying cases and none denied she had no ; ‘expectations the requests would not be approved. 4 When no answer was received by the 30, Petitioner spent the weekend deleting text to fit into the statutory page limit and filed the | . i fs : Petition on Monday, June 3-4. “ These Motions were denied by the Court but not until July 11, 2019. | | On July 30" Petitioner mailed a document erroneously entitled = +s “Petition for Rehearing” that presented the following questions to be . ~ answered which are now copied here. See