No. 20-936

Judy Knight v. Ward & Glass, et al.

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-01-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure due-process page-limit rehearing standing time-extension
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court erred in denying Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Application to Exceed Page Limit

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Introduction: , On 5/23/2019 Petitioner filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time To File A Petition For Rehearing thought to be due on Saturday 6/1 ; (i.e. Monday 6/3) with attached Affidavit and an Application to Exceed the ' Page Limit. ‘Having known that more than 100 such extension requests had been allowed to attorneys in the underlying cases and none denied she had no ; ‘expectations the requests would not be approved. 4 When no answer was received by the 30, Petitioner spent the weekend deleting text to fit into the statutory page limit and filed the | . i fs : Petition on Monday, June 3-4. “ These Motions were denied by the Court but not until July 11, 2019. | | On July 30" Petitioner mailed a document erroneously entitled = +s “Petition for Rehearing” that presented the following questions to be . ~ answered which are now copied here. See

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2020-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2021)

Attorneys

Judy Knight
Judy Knight — Petitioner
Judy Knight — Petitioner