No. 20-939
Colette Marie Wilcox v. Nathan H. Lyons, et al.
Response RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: circuit-conflict civil-rights constitutional-provisions discrimination equal-protection fourteenth-amendment invidious-discrimination retaliation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess FirstAmendment EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess FirstAmendment EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits retaliation against a person who has complained about invidious discrimination
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits retaliation against a person who has complained about invidious discrimination. @®
Docket Entries
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-20
Reply of petitioner Colette Wilcox filed.
2021-05-05
Brief of respondents Nathan H. Lyons, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-03-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 5, 2021.
2021-03-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 5, 2021 to May 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-05
Response Requested. (Due April 5, 2021)
2021-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2021)
Attorneys
Colette Wilcox
Nathan H. Lyons, et al.
Rosalie Vaughan Pemberton Fessier — Timberlake, Smith, et al., Respondent
Rosalie Vaughan Pemberton Fessier — Timberlake, Smith, et al., Respondent