Jean Barton, et vir v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
DueProcess Takings
when-the-lower-federal-courts-abandon-28-usc-section-1738
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When the lower federal courts abandon 28 U.S.C. Section 1738State and Territorial statutes and ‘ judicial proceedings; full faith and credit and imperatives of the fifth amendment to provide equal . protection for an sixty nine year old senior by denying that it is a manifest injustice and expressing disbelief of fraud upon the court, does it set a dangerous precedent for all landowners whose land has been taken unconstitutionally? 2. Should the Court grant certiorari to resolve the significant division among the circuits concerning the jurisdictional prerequisites for appealing a 28 US.C. § 1738 and No.14-17498 of the Ninth Appeals publish opinion; Claim Splitting while an Objection was filed with the 9th Circuit a timely appeal was submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court and did the Ninth Circuit improperly applied a . defective Res Judicata that voided a 28 U.S.C. § 1738 and No. 14-17498 by law that protected against the 9th Claim Splitting which allowed . Chase Bank, ownership of a Bifurcated Mortgage that lacked Due Process when taking property? 8. Should this be a Direct Appeal to the Supreme Court for a violation of Constitutional law “Due a Process”, 28 U.S.C. § 1738 and should the court : grant certiorari to resolve the significant division among the circuits concerning the jurisdictional prerequisites? ii ; INTERESTED PARTIES There are no