Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals committed reversible error

Questions Presented For Review. 1. Whether or not, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals committed a Reversible Error, by concluding that, “the Petitioner fails to address how the District Court erred by dismissing his action for failure to state a claim”? 2. Whether or not, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals abused its Discretion by denying the Petitioner's timely filed, Petition for Panel Rehearing, which reiterated the Petitioner's Opening Brief for a Lost Legal Mail and which was the overlooked or misapprehended point of fact or law? | 3. Whether or not, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals exceeded its Jurisdiction, therein, for the Plaintiff's Complaint, dismissed under Rule | 12(b)(6), failure to state a claim, “under, Neitzke v. Williams 490 U.S. 319 | | (1989) 109 S.Ct., 1827, 104 L.Ed. 2d 338, at 326 and 329, which found by \ a 9-0, vote that it had in fact stated a cognizable claim” was specific to the . factual case before it? } (i) ve . | tal | Parties to Proceeding and Related Cases. | Petitioner: (same) Respondents: Jill Eggleston, Director of Operations for National Records Center. G 6641, Thompson, Deportation Officer for U.S. Dep't of Homeland Security. Secretary (Fmr.) John Kerry for U.S. Dep't of State Related Cases. , This Case is Federal collaterally challenged in: , | : Ibeabuchi v. Penzone, No. U.S. District Court , | for the State of Arizona, Phoenix. Judgment entered, May 25, 2018. | . Ibeabuchi v. Penzone, NO. 19-16049, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth | Circuit. Judgment entered, October 31, 2018. . Ibeabuchi v. Penzone, Application For Extension Of Time To File A Petition “ For A Writ Of Certiorari, granted by Honorable Justice Kagan on, June 11, . 2019 and whose Petition was filed on, June 26, 2019, according to the : : Proof of Mailing (Postmark) but, was not docketed, till date. (See,