Veena Sharma v. Santander Bank
SocialSecurity Immigration
whether-district-court-and-appeals-court-dismissal-is-sufficient-for-review
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ‘ , 1. Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim without issuing summons to Respondent, without any hearing, and without jury trial as requested by Petitioner is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Supreme Court. 2. Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim on wrong/incorrect interpretation of Statue of Limitations (10 years) is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Superior Court. : 3. Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit decision of dismissing Petitioner’s claim on grounds of Preclusion is sufficient for review by the honorable Untied States Supreme Court. y PARTIES TO PROCEEDING AND RELATED CASES PARTIES ; . 1. Veena Sharma ; 2. Santander Bank ; RELATED CASES 1. Veena Sharma v. Fidelity Investments (Civil Action No.: 19-12186-FDS)