Did the Supreme Court of Alabama deprive Petitioner of due process of law?

Question Presented Did the Supreme Court of Alabama deprive Petitioner of due process of law, when it affirmed his conviction based on (a) first-impression interpretations of criminal statutes that a reasonable person would not have known to be the law, and (b) a factual theory (that Petitioner took certain official actions in exchange for payment) that the prosecutors had declared at trial to be irrelevant to their case? i