No. 20-989

City of Newark, New Jersey v. Fraternal Order of Police, Newark Lodge No. 12

Lower Court: New Jersey
Docketed: 2021-01-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2)
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights department-of-justice due-process equal-protection municipal-authority police-oversight racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess LaborRelations Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a state supreme court violate the Equal Protection Clause by reading state statutes to preclude its largest city from protecting Black citizens from institutionalized, racially-disparate police conduct specifically found unconstitutional by the Department of Justice?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented 1. Does a state supreme court violate the Equal Protection Clause by reading state statutes to preclude its largest city from protecting Black citizens from institutionalized, racially-disparate police conduct specifically found unconstitutional by the Department of Justice? 2. Does a state supreme court violate the Necessary and Proper Clause by interpreting state statutes to preclude municipal police review boards from holding subpoena power or accessing certain internal affairs records, when the existing process has been found unconstitutional by the Department of Justice? 3. Does a state supreme court violate the Constitutional Separation of Powers doctrine by holding that the state executive’s police oversight regulations preempt the state legislature’s delegation of police oversight authority to municipalities? ii II. Related Cases Statement The City of Newark, by and through counsel Pashman Stein Walder Hayden PC, respectfully petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the August 19, 2020 Opinion and Order of the New Jersey Supreme Court. The directly related matters comprise the underlying United States Department of Justice civil rights litigation, and the proceedings below: 1. New Jersey Supreme Court: Fraternal Order of Police Newark Lodge No. 12 v. City of Newark, Docket No. A-15-19. Resolved by published Opinion dated August 19, 2020. 2. New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division: Fraternal Order of Police Newark Lodge No. 12 v. City of Newark, Docket No. A-3298-17. Resolved by published Opinion dated June 18, 2019. 3. New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division: Fraternal Order of Police Newark Lodge No. 12 v. City of Newark, Docket No. C-177-16. Resolved by oral ruling dated March 14, 2018. 4. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey: United States v. City of Newark, Docket No. 2:16-cv-1731. Resolved by five-year Consent Decree entered May 5, 2016. ili Ill. Tables of Contents and Authorities

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-12
Reply of petitioner City of Newark filed.
2021-03-29
Brief amicus curiae of Jersey City Police Officers Benevolent Association filed.
2021-03-25
Brief of respondent Fraternal Order of Police, Newark Lodge No. 12 in opposition filed.
2021-02-25
Brief amicus curiae of City of Jersey City filed.
2021-02-09
Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Fraternal Order of Police, Newark Lodge No. 12.
2021-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 29, 2021.
2021-02-03
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, City of Newark
2021-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2021 to March 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)

Attorneys

City of Jersey City
Victor Alexander AfanadorLite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC, Amicus
City of Newark
Alan SilberPashman Stein Walder Hayden, Petitioner
Fraternal Order of Police, Newark Lodge No. 12
Quintes D. TaglioliMarkowitz & Richman, Respondent
Matthew D. AremanMarkowitz & Richman, Respondent
Jersey City Police Officers Benevolent Association
James M. MetsMets Schiro & McGovern, LLP, Amicus