Whether the Fourth Amendment requires more stringent privacy considerations in authorizing a warrant for the seizure of a cellphone and the manner its data is search

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Fourth Amendment requires more stringent privacy considerations in authorizing a warrant for the seizure of a cellphone and the manner its data is search. 2. Whether the District court and court of appeals , for the third circuit erred in determining the government met its burden to support a conviction under the advance knowledge requirement for aiding and abetting a murder under 924G)(1) and 2, announced in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65, 134 S.Ct. 1240, 188 L.Ed.2d 248 (2014) or The Pinkerton v. United States, under 28 U.S. 640 (1947) reasonably foreseeable requirement. i LIST OF PROCEEDINGS United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ; No. 18-2372 United States of America v. Anthony Vetri, Appellant Date of Final Opinion: April 23, 2020 Date of Rehearing Denial: June 11, 2020 United States District Court for the Eastern District : of Pennsylvania Criminal No. 15-157 United States of America v. Anthony Vetri, Michael Vandergrift, Defendants Date of Final Opinion: November 22, 2017 Date of Final Order: November 8, 2017