No. 21-1
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights due-process fourth-amendment mandatory-victim-restitution-act marital-property pension-rights
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress intended to deprive married spouses of rights to their husband's pensions which are afforded to divorced spouses under Massachusetts law in violation of the Fourth Amendment and/or whether the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act violated Shilo Abell's Fourth Amendment rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Congress intended to deprive married spouses of rights to their husband’s pensions which are afforded to divorced spouses under Massachusetts law in violation of the Fourth Amendment and/or whether the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act violated Shilo Abell’s Fourth Amendment rights? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Shilo Abell
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent