No. 21-1022

Daniel Garza v. City of Los Angeles, California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constructive-notice due-process monell monell-doctrine municipal-liability policy-maker ratification unconstitutional-conduct
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

May a municipality be held liable for ratification under Monell v. Department of Social Services

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) May a municipality be held liable for ratification, under Monell v. Department of Social Services, when the final policy maker has constructive notice of a subordinate’s unconstitutional conduct, deliberately takes no action, and affirms the conduct? 2) Can ajury be deprived of directly relevant evidence of ratification in the form of a letter, with the Chief of Police’s letterhead, affirming the unconstitutional conduct as “justified, lawful, and proper”? u NOTICE OF RELATED CASES Pursuant to Supreme Court rule 14.1(b), please take notice of the following related cases: Garza v. City of Los Angeles, No. 19-55952: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. Judgment entered on July 26, 2021; rehearing denied September 7, 2021. Garzav. City of Los Angeles, Mario Cardona, 2:16-cv-03579: United States District Court, Central District of California. Judgment for Plaintiff against Mario Cardona entered on June 27, 2017. Judgment for the City of Los Angeles entered on July 16, 2019.

Docket Entries

2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Daniel Garza
Paul Lindsey HoffmanSchonbrun Seplow Harris Hoffman & Zeldes, LL P, Petitioner