No. 21-1023

Kay Gow v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-1348 contract contract-breach federal-statute grant-application grant-funding investment-agreement investor-sophistication misrepresentation subscription-agreement wire-fraud
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Can the provisions of the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, be interpreted to criminalize a breach of a contract by grant recipient, where the parties contemplated a contractual remedy for the breach, and the alleged misrepresentations were aspirational statements made in a forward-looking grant application?

2. May an individual be convicted of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 where the victim, a sophisticated investor, executed a subscription agreement prior to his investment that directly contradicted his claim that the defendant lied to him to procure his investment?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a breach of contract by a grant recipient be criminalized under the federal wire fraud statute?

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)
2021-11-24
Application (21A177) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 14, 2022.
2021-11-22
Application (21A177) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Kay Gow
Andrew Brooks GreenleeAndrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent