No. 21-1023
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-1348 contract contract-breach federal-statute grant-application grant-funding investment-agreement investor-sophistication misrepresentation subscription-agreement wire-fraud
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can the provisions of the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, be interpreted to criminalize a breach of a contract by grant recipient, where the parties contemplated a contractual remedy for the breach, and the alleged misrepresentations were aspirational statements made in a forward-looking grant application?
2. May an individual be convicted of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 where the victim, a sophisticated investor, executed a subscription agreement prior to his investment that directly contradicted his claim that the defendant lied to him to procure his investment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a breach of contract by a grant recipient be criminalized under the federal wire fraud statute?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)
2021-11-24
Application (21A177) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 14, 2022.
2021-11-22
Application (21A177) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Kay Gow
Andrew Brooks Greenlee — Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent