No. 21-1026

Camille A. Walters v. Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation, et al.

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2022-01-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence-tampering judicial-ethics procedural-irregularity prosecutor-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct recusal recusal-requirement standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was it illegal that the Wisconsin Supreme Court disregarded their own rules of internal operating procedures

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Was it illegal that the Wisconsin Supreme Court disregarded their own rules of internal operating : procedures, which require all decisions of the court : to be supported, at minimum, by the citation of the . authority or statement of grounds upon which the decision is based? II. Why did the OLR initially investigate my claims of prosecutor malfeasance and then dismiss and close the investigation when I provided the proof of malfeasance in the form of a Blood Warrant and Affidavit that proved the breaking of federal law of false swearing? III. Why did Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler take part in the ruling of my Malfeasance Petition when she should have recused herself? IV. Is it legal for a DA to withhold first blood (inculpatory) evidence and submit time delayed and . compromised blood evidence which could have mistakenly been an exculpatory factor, in favor of a defendant? ; V. Did DA Mark Bensen violate due process by knowingly and intentionally directing a later compro; mised blood sample for the defendant when he : should have submitted the uncompromised first blood sample which was available? VI. Is it legal for a District Attorney to conceal the dis; closure of the initial BAC of a criminal who killed 2 people and seriously injured 3 others? ii RELATED CASES e Petition for Review, Malfeasance Complaint against Office of Lawyer Regulation Keith Sellen, Director and District Attorney, Mark Bensen, Wisconsin Supreme Court, Judgment entered Oct. 18, 2021. e Supreme Court of Wisconsin, Office of Lawyer Regulation, Review of the Decision to Close my Grievance against DA Mark Bensen, Judgment entered July 26, 2021. e Supreme Court of Wisconsin, Office of Lawyer Regulation, Decision to Close my Grievance against DA Mark Bensen, Judgment entered July 15, 2021.

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation, et al. to respond filed.
2022-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Camille A. Walters
Camille A. Walters — Petitioner
Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation, et al.
Brian Patrick KeenanWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent