No. 21-1036
Gamon Plus, Inc. v. Campbell Soup Company, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law appointments-clause arthrex-precedent federal-circuit judicial-remand patent-law patent-review rehearing-petition remand separation-of-powers
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Securities Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for further proceedings in light of Arthrex
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should vacate the judgment below in view of its recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1970 (2021), and remand so that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may in turn order the Director (or Acting Director) to decide whether to rehear the petition filed by Respondents Campbell Soup Company, Campbell Sales Company, and Trinity Manufacturing, LLC. i
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Trinity Manufacturing, LLC to respond filed.
2022-01-26
Waiver of right of respondents Campbell Soup Company; Campbell Sales Company to respond filed.
2022-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Campbell Soup Company; Campbell Sales Company
Steven Eric Jedlinski — Holland & Knight LLP, Respondent
Gamon Plus, Inc.
Andrew Lloyd Tiajoloff — Tiajoloff & Kelly LLP, Petitioner
Trinity Manufacturing, LLC
Martin B. Pavane — Davis Firm P.C., Respondent