No. 21-1037

Steve Wilson Briggs v. James Cameron, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 9th-circuit civil-procedure copyright-law due-process judicial-accountability judicial-interpretation judicial-system legal-authorities shell-corporations standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Copyright JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 9th Circuit has betrayed the Founders' intents by disregarding established authorities and creating its own copyright law system

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, by disregarding properly established U.S. authorities (Corpus Juris Secundum, C.J.S.), to surreptitiously create its own copyright law system (based on Melville and David Nimmer’s “Nimmer on Copyright”, | which runs counter to the C.J.S.), the 9th Circuit has betrayed the Founders’ intents. 2. Whether U.S. judges and justices’ ownership of shell corporations subverts | faith in the U.S. judicial system, and/or betrays the Founders’ intents. | 3. Whether a ruling that ignores superseding law, to base itself in subordinate law, can be valid. 4. Whether U.S. federal courts using Ashcroft v Iqbal to avoid accountability . and hide their improper copyright infringement rulings, has undermined America’s national character and global standing.

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-17
Waiver of right of respondents James Cameron, et al. to respond filed.
2022-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2022)

Attorneys

James Cameron, et al.
Jean-Paul JassyJassy Vick Carolan LLP, Respondent
Steve Wilson Briggs
Steve K. Wilson Briggs — Petitioner