Did Justice Clark V. Richardson violate civil-rights under-color-of-law

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Did Justice Clark V. Richardson, former judge of the Bronx County Family Court, violate our civil rights under color of law, by writing and publishing an order saying we were adjudicated guilty of educational neglect for our two minor daughters in a 2002 Bronx County Family Court case of attempted malicious prosecution? Did he further publish that order knowing he didn't preside over, or sit on the bench in any of more than 25 appearances by us and another judge in a different court? “ (2) Did the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct ignore our complaint due to racism, when we told them he was not the judge? New York . Consolidated Laws; Family Court Act-FCT subsection | , 340.2. The violation of our civil rights is deliberate and offensive. Justice Clark V. Richardson perjured himself by claiming falsely to be the presiding judge who sat on the case. His violation of the public trust is : aided and abetted by the NYS Judicial Conduct . commission's failure to respond to us in any way. (3) Did Justice Janet DiFiore, as Chief Administrative Judge and Respondent Superior, for the New York . State Unified Court System, fail to launch an official, independent investigation into the truth of our statements? She is remiss in her duty to ensure that no judge, court or clerk take any adverse action against us without our knowledge, pursuant to statute, as the affected parties. Every New York state judge and court we appeared before or wrote, sat by with i ; closed lips and folded arms while we scrambled for justice seeking relief. What was the reason that two homeschool applications, signed by the chief administrator of the state's homeschool division, were not enough to warrant a dismissal of the racist, malicious cause of action in any state court or tribunal? (4) Did Judge Ramos from the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, co-sign with Clark V. Richardson's erroneous order without . . conducting his own inquiry due to racial indifference? Did he agree with the decision due to his personal bias : for black people like all the rest of those we encountered throughout the case? Did he turn a racist blind eye to how erroneous the case began, on defective _ unstamped petitions, given to us in court without . ' written notice, at the initial family court appearance in front of Justice Maureen A. McLeod? Why did the case ever get assigned to trial by Justice Clark V. Richardson without legally sufficient cause? His ulterior motive for the "Trial" seemed to be in . | retaliation for us getting Justice Maureen A. McLeod forcibly removed from the case for failing to hear or see . proof of our timely homeschool applications. The bullying and physical assault of our minor daughters | daily in the public school they attended was the entire | reason for withdrawing them to be homeschooled. Judge Ramos, like the rest, was told these facts when | we filed our appeal in his court. | (5) Did Justices Calabresi, Parker, and Menashi of the United Stated Court of Appeals For The Second | ii , | | | | | | | Circuit also apply racism when they agreed with Clark | V. Richardson's flawed ruling, written and published , despite his not presiding at any point in the proceedings of 2+ years? Does the fact that Justice , Richardson nor Justice Janet DiFiore offered any | rebuttal or response, and had no state appointed or designated legal representation under our appeal seem | unlawful to anyone except us? Is it customary or even | permitted for the clerk of the reviewing judges to write | and send forth their response to our appeal? Every i judge, clerk, and administrative official demonstrates a willful failure to address our complaint and blatantly | refused to give a valid, legally sufficient response to our brief. We demand monetary relief, a written apology to the four of us, a full retraction and we } deserve answers to the lies intended to cause our } . suffering. The entire New York State Co