No. 21-1058
Oklahoma v. Marquise Petey White
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law due-process equal-protection indian-country non-indian-defendants public-safety state-prosecution tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State has authority to prosecute nonIndians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a State has authority to prosecute nonIndians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals No. C-2020-113 Marquise Petey White, Appellant v. The State of Oklahoma, Appellee Date of Final Opinion: October 28, 2021 Oklahoma District Court (Rogers County) No. CF-2017-762 The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff v. Marquise Petey White, Defendant Date of Judgment and Sentence: December 20, 2019
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-08-01
MANDATE ISSUED
2022-06-30
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Oklahoma</i> v. <i>Castro-Huerta</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-01
Brief of respondent Marquise P. White in opposition filed.
2022-03-01
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Marquise P. White.
2022-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Marquise P. White
James H. Lockard — OK Indigent Defense System, Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner