Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals circumvent the appeals process by ignoring significant evidence which demonstrated that the district court trial judge (TJ) obliterated Keith Caldwell's right to due process of the law

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW: 1 Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals circumvent ; the appeals process by ignoring significant evidence which demonstrated that the district court trial judge (TJ) obliterated Keith Caldwell’s (henceforth referred to as (Caldwell), right to due process of the law,} by poisoning the trial process? The TJ’s obstruction of justice, and numerous violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F-R.C.P.), , were the hallmark of the appeal filed by (Caldwell). The decision letter filed by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals did not address the evidence relative to the TJ’s criminal violation of the trial process; (F.RA.P.) rules; and the ensuing judgment which harmed (Caldwell’s lawsuit). 2 Was the rule of law held hostage to the whims of a rogue officer of the court, the TJ illegally dismiss the Michigan-based defendants, in the (Caldwell) lawsuit, the TJ’s critical and unwarranted action set the stage for dismissal of all the defendants in (Caldwell’s) lawsuit? 3 Was the unconstitutional decision to dismiss the Michigan-based defendants the end result of fruit of the poisonous tree”? The defendants’ dismissal motion was flawed and it excluded critical infor} mation that the TJ needed to know in advance, before filing the court’s first Order to Dismiss in Jul } The 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ® “Fruit of the poison tree.” | ; , ! ii , | Rule 14.1(a)) SCOTUS QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW: | — Continued | ‘19 and again in the second Order to dismiss in Oct ‘19. The TJ’s Order to dismiss violated (Caldwell’s) | right to due process under the 5th Amendment/ | 14th Amendment — The Fifth Amendment says to | the federal government that no one shall _be “de) prived of life, liberty or property without due pro| cess of law.” This miscarriage of justice was the hallmark of the trial judge decision to dismiss the Michigan defendants from the lawsuit. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause to describe a legal obligation of all states. The TJ cor; rupted the trial process by premature dismissal of the Michigan defendants. The dismissal motion ‘ contained perjured content. The defendants had impeded the summons process. The TJ was in, formed through the petitioner’s filings to the court. , Still the defendants were dismissed even though they had impeded the summons process. 4 Is perjury, judicial misconduct, violations of the FR.C.P. & FR.A.P. acceptable defense strategies to dismiss a legally filed lawsuit, if so, the Rules of the Court (district court & appellate court) require massive revision. 5 Does the approved legislative action, the Safety Act, actually provide the public the right to file a lawsuit based on a Safety Act grievance, or is the 11th circuit court revision (not approved by the Congress nor the public, in play now?) : | | iii (Rule 14.10b)) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS