Whether plaintiffs' erroneously given 'inferior status' and denied the right to redress the UNITED STATES on obligations such as certificates of indebtedness and federal income tax returns on 'United States' tax liability issues by denying access to the court because of false threshold reasons under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) can be collaterally attacked

No question identified. : 1 Constitutional Questions / Federal Questions 1. Whether plaintiffs’ erroneously given “inferior status” and denied the right to redress the UNITED STATES . on obligations such as certificates of indebtedness and federal income tax returns on “United States” tax liability issues by denying access to the court because of false threshold reasons under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the (“RCFC”) can collaterally attack the federal employees bonds, risk management policies and equity under 26 U.S.C. 2203; 26 U.S.C. 2002:18 U.S.C. 242; and 26 U.S.C. 7203 ? 2. Whether Federal Court Clerks and Judges erroneously , labeled the United States as “government” allowing ; the assumption that the United States has “sovereign ; immunity from suit” under the grounds of United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 586 (1941) can deny plaintiffs’ who are indigenous people and secured . ; party creditors due process of the law and the right to redress tax fraud and original issue discount abuse by : the United States under 18 U.S.C. 1028 can be } collaterally attacked by plaintiffs’ under 28 : U.S.C.3002; and 18 U.S.C.242? 3. Whether the United States can erroneously limit the | definition of debt instruments to Federal Reserve | Notes under 26 U.S.C. 1273 1275 while it | systemically keep private bankers / secured party | creditors from using their exemption provided in House Joint Resolution 192 and public law 73.10 can | be sued 12 U.S.C. 1813()(1)(2)? | 4. Whether plaintiffs’ debt instruments issued with | original issue discount in the actual or constructive } possession of the United States Employees are | includable as gross income under 26 USC section 61 can collaterally attack federal employees bonds, | | ii equity and risk management policies under 26 U.S.C. ' 7201 and 18 U.S.C.242? 5. Whether plaintiffs’ who’s original issue discount has . been abused and erroneously used by the United States State and Federal Judges under the Internal Revenue Service Publication 1212 concerning nominee can collaterally attack the United States and its agents under 12 U.S.C. 378 (a)(1)(2)(b); and 26 C.F.R. 1:701-2? 6. Whether a plaintiffs’ debt instrument issued with original issue discount and in the actual or constructive possession of the United States Judge(s) erroneously held as illegal contraband makes the United States Judges “executor” and Liable for the taxes during a taxable termination event can be collaterally attacked by plaintiffs’ under 26 U.S.C. 2203; 26 U.S.C. 2002; and 26 C.F.R. 1.701-2? 7. Whether plaintiffs’ erroneously not given the required copy of the 1099 OID showing plaintiffs’ as the payor ; of the funds and the United States as the recipients of ; . the funds under the original issue discount rules ; concerning taxable income can collaterally attack the United States for failure to file and abuse of the original issue discount under U.C.C. 3-305; 26 U.S.C. 1273; 15 U.S.C. 1692; 26 CFR 1.1275-2 (g); and 26 U.S.C. section 61(a)(4)? 8. Whether a secured party creditor erroneously foreclosed on by United States Trustee under Florida Statute 45.0315 can collaterally attack her illegal search and seizure under the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution: and 26 U.S.C. 2612? 9. Whether an accommodation bill of exchange functions in effect as a short — term collateral — backed interest bearing loan and does the buyer in this transaction } have a right to be repaid the principal and interest | . | | | ill (coupons) on the bond at maturity or sale under UCC , 4-106(b)? , 10.Whether a secured party erroneously denied | discharge by the United States Agents has a right to | take possession of certificates of indebtedness that is the end result of an accommodation bill of exchange entered into with the United States when the United States is in default under UCC 9-609(b)(c) can be collaterally attacked under 12 U.S.C. 411; and 12 U.S.C. 1813(L)(1)(2)? 11.Is an indigenous American acting as a secured party credi