No. 21-1072

Steven Carrol DeMocker v. Arizona

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2022-02-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defense due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel federal-question implausible-defense ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-strategy right-to-counsel third-party-culpability
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether offering an implausible third-party culpability defense violates a defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED This petition presents the question whether offering an implausible third-party culpability defense violates a defendant’s right to the effective assistance of counsel where there is a readily available, coherent, and compelling defense.

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arizona to respond filed.
2022-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2022)

Attorneys

State of Arizona
Steven A. YoungYavapai County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Steven A. YoungYavapai County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Steven DeMocker
John Robert MillsPhillips Black, Petitioner
John Robert MillsPhillips Black, Petitioner