Whether the Michigan Supreme Court's application of Batson was objectively unreasonable

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT APPLICATION OF BATSON WAS OBECTIVELY UNREASONABLE BY ACCEPTING CLEARLY ERRONEOUS FINDINGS AND DEFERRING TO TRIAL COURT SUBJECTIVE RULINGS THAT WERE UNTETHERED TO THE ACTUAL RECORD? Il. WHETHER BAD FAITH APPLICATION OF BATSON THAT INFRINGES UPON THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN A FAIR TRIAL IS STRUCTURAL ERROR? i STATEMENT UNDER RULE 29.6 Petitioner, through counsel, hereby discloses and notes that there is no parent or publicly held company owning 10% or more of any corporation’s stock involved in this matter. il