Whether the Courts Erred by Misstating Alice's Appeal

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Courts Erred by Misstating Alice ; , | Failed to Properly Amend Her Notice of Appeal | when Alice Guan Did Correctly File 3 Notices of , | | _ Appeals. . | ‘ 2. Whether the Courts Erred by Not Recognizing | | Rules 8002(a)(2), 8009, 8018 Thus Deemed Alice po Guan Did Not Appeal the 2 Written Orders Dated | July 10 and August 4, 2020. : | 3. Whether the Courts Have Misstated Bankruptcy | Courts’ Oral Order Made on June 17, 2020 and Incorrectly Disjointed the It From the June 23, 2020 Order Thus Erred to Recognize Alice Guan Correctly Appealed the Tandem Order. | 4. Whether Courts Erred by Deeming the Tandem | Order and the July 10 and August 4, 2020 Order | As Not Final Orders. : 5. Whether Courts Erred by Depriving Alice Guan’s _ Appeal Rights and Her Rights for Due Process | . | . . i : ; RELATED CASES United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Docket #: 21-12970, Alice Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association US. District Court Middle District of Florida (Or| lando), Case #: 6:20-cv-01243-WWB, Guan v. Ellings| worth Residential Community Association, Inc. | US. Bankruptcy Court Middle District of Florida (Orlando), Bankruptcy Petition #: 6:20-bk-01346-LVV Debtor Ellingsworth Residential Community Association, Ine. ; United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Docket #: 20-13381, Alice Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association SCOTUS Case #: 21-1049 . |