Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Is it unlawful to advance the Political agenda
of a Pennsylvania Municipality by violating the Civil
Rights of its resident?
(2) Is it unlawful for a Pennsylvania Municipality to conspire with others to commit fraud upon the
Court in order to take away the property rights of a
resident?
(3) Is it unlawful to deny a pro-se litigant his day
in court before a jury of his peers based on technicalities of pleadings and not based on the merits of the
case?
(4) Will the decision of the Court cause the public
to lose confidence in our Judicial system and the Rule
of Law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it unlawful to advance the Political agenda of a Pennsylvania Municipality by violating the Civil Rights of its resident?
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-04-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-02-18
Waiver of right of respondents Tinicum Township, Bucks County, PA, Nicholas Forte, et al. to respond filed.
2022-02-18
Waiver of right of respondents Eastburn and Gray, P.C., Michael J. Savona, Michael E. Peters and Michael T. Pidgeon to respond filed.
2022-02-17
Waiver of right of respondents Stephen B. Harris, Esquire, Harris and Harris, Township Solicitor to respond filed.
2022-02-09
Waiver of right of respondents Keystone Municipal Engineering, Inc. and Tom Fountain, P.E. to respond filed.
2022-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 10, 2022)
2021-12-16
Application (21A226) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 4, 2022.
2021-12-06
Application (21A226) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 6, 2021 to February 4, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.