No. 21-1128

John Turnure v. Latrent Redrick

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-15
Status: Dismissed
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights due-process excessive-force qualified-immunity scott-v-harris sixth-circuit summary-judgment use-of-force
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Sixth Circuit contravene Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) by ignoring record admissions, videos, and photographs to credit to Redrick with a telling of the facts that no reasonable jury could believe?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the Sixth Circuit contravene Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007) by ignoring record admissions, videos, and photographs to credit to Redrick with a telling of the facts that no reasonable jury could believe? I. Did the Sixth Circuit violate this Court’s clear establishment jurisprudence by holding that Officer Turnure’s conduct was obviously unconstitutional, or alternatively clearly established, using cases involving different justifications for use of lethal force?

Docket Entries

2022-03-16
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2022-03-15
Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 filed.
2022-02-24
Application (21A442) denied by Justice Kavanaugh.
2022-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent Latrent Redrick to respond filed.
2022-02-18
Application (21A442) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2022-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 17, 2022)

Attorneys

John Turnure
John Christopher ReeceSuite 202, Petitioner
Latrent Redrick
Louis Everett GrubeFlowers & Grube, Respondent