No. 21-1136

M. S. v. J. B.

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2022-02-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: due-process equal-protection ex-parte-order ex-parte-restraining-orders false-impression-of-dangerousness fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment records-expungement restraining-order vacated-orders
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

due-process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED . ; Mass. G.L. c. 209A(1)b provides for ex-parte : restraining orders, records of which are maintained regardless of whether the order is vacated following a two-party hearing. In Vaccaro v. Vaccaro, 425 Mass. 153, 157-158 (1997) the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court found that “there is no statute that permits an order’s record ...to be expunged from the statewide system.” The question presented is: : Does Mass. G.L. c. 209A(1)b prima facie infringe a defendant’s 5th and 14th Amendment rights to due process and equal protection, with no remedy, by making the record of a vacated ex-parte restraining ; order, that did not survive two-party scrutiny, available to courts and law enforcement, which, respectively, may use it to.assess a false impression of dangerousness : in a traffic stop or as a reason to withhold bail in regard to the defendant. ii .

Docket Entries

2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2022)

Attorneys

M. S.
M. S. — Petitioner
M. S. — Petitioner