No. 21-1139
Daikin Industries, Ltd., et al. v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act agency-deference appellate-review factual-determination factual-review judicial-review remand separation-of-powers
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental Securities Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Environmental Securities Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal appellate court may reverse an administrative agency's decision on a factual ground not addressed by the agency, without a remand to that agency, consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act and the principles of separation of powers
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED May a federal appellate court, consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act and the principles of separation of powers embedded within that Act, reverse an administrative agency’s decision on a factual ground not addressed by the agency, without a remand to that agency?
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent The Chemours Company, FC, LLC to respond filed.
2022-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Daikin Industries, Ltd. and Daikin America, Inc.
Gregory Andrew Castanias — Jones Day, Petitioner
The Chemours Company, FC, LLC
Timothy John Rawson — Fish & Richardson P.C., Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent