1. Does Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) preempt classification-based discrimination claims by a customer against an interactive computer service for its own misconduct, as opposed to misconduct of a third party?

2. Does Section 230(c)(2)(A) of the CDA preempt claims where the plaintiff alleges the interactive computer service acted in bad faith?

3. Should Petitioner be afforded an opportunity to amend the complaint where the district court denied leave to amend as futile based on CDA immunity, but on appeal the Second Circuit sustained dismissal based only on its holding that Petitioners failed to allege sufficient facts of discrimination without even addressing CDA immunity?

Does Section 230(c)(1) preempt discrimination claims against an interactive computer service?