No. 21-1148
SB Building Associates Limited Partnership v. Bunce Atkinson, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: article-i article-i-courts article-iii article-iii-courts bankruptcy bankruptcy-property constitutional-limitations due-process judicial-review property-rights separation-of-powers
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Congress may consistent with Separation of Powers principles deny Article III courts the power to review an Article I court's decision allowing the sale of petitioner's bankruptcy property
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. May Congress consistent with Separation of Powers principles deny Article III courts of the power to review an Article I court’s decision allowing the sale of petitioner's bankruptcy property? II. Can the unconstitutional deprivation of petitioner’s property caused by the provisions of § 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code be remedied by requiring de novo review by an Article III court?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent Iron Mountain Information Management, LLC to respond filed.
2022-02-22
Waiver of right of respondents Leon Kitovsky and CF Warehouse LLC to respond filed.
Attorneys
Iron Mountain Information Management, LLC
Edward T. Kole — Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Respondent
Edward T. Kole — Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Respondent
Leon Kitovsky and CF Warehouse LLC
Matthew Nis Leerberg — Fox Rothschild LLP, Respondent
Matthew Nis Leerberg — Fox Rothschild LLP, Respondent
SB Building Associates Limited Partnership
Dennis P. Derrick — Petitioner
Dennis P. Derrick — Petitioner