No. 21-1150
Sharon Finizie, et al. v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure due-process factual-findings federal-circuit judicial-review legal-misapplication merit-systems-protection-board standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Securities EmploymentDiscrimina
Securities EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the decisions/opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Merit Systems Protection Board constitute erroneous factual findings, misapplications of law, and inappropriate personal attacks on the appearance of the Petitioners?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Did the decisions/opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Merit Systems Protection Board constitute erroneous factual findings, misapplications of law, and inappropriate personal attacks on the appearance of the Petitioners? i
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Veterans Affairs to respond filed.
2022-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Department of Veterans Affairs
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sharon Finizie, et al.
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner