No. 21-1162
Erika Bailey-Johnson v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure-act court-of-federal-claims federal-jurisdiction injunctive-relief jurisdiction statutory-interpretation tohono-o'odham-nation tohono-precedent united-states-court-of-federal-claims united-states-v-tohono-o'odham-nation
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the Court revisit its holding in Tohono to determine whether, under 28 U.S.C. § 1500, a U.S. District Court action solely for injunctive or declaratory relief under the Administrative Procedure Act is "for or in respect" to a "claim" against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for money damages?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court revisit its holding in Tohono to determine whether, under 28 U.S.C. § 1500, a U.S. District Court action solely for injunctive or declaratory relief under the Administrative Procedure Act is 'for or in respect' to a 'claim' against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for money damages?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Erika Bailey-Johnson
Daniel Julian Cragg — Eckland & Blando, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent