No. 21-117

Vernon Deck v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment bankruptcy civil-rights due-process foreclosure fraud judicial-discretion property-rights rule-41b standing
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) When a foreign National claims Citizenship on escrow documents, but is not a citizen, is that Mortgage Valid or VOID?

2) Since Escrow Instructions are equally binding on each party signing the same Mortgage, Is the mortgage binding on the parties when one party (in bad faith) intentionally fails to sign as prepared, and required by the Escrow Instructions?

3) Prior to a mortgage being discharged in a Bankruptcy Chapter- 7, after a National Bank withdraws its Motion to lift the Automatic Stay, Is it legal for them to reassign it to another National Bank for the express purpose of collection, while the Automatic Stay is firmly in place? Can the assignee legally attempt to collect within the same stay?

4) The Ninth Circuit determined this pro se litigant clearly had Standing, then Reversed and Remanded it back to the Eastern District Court for review! it was DISMISSED without further hearing, claiming gamesmanship (41(b)), and never reached any merits. Did the District Court have disgression to ignore the 9th Circuit 's authority? (Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 1,2)

5) In light of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, Does the trial courts ' refusal to hear the Merits, denying the Due Process of Law, fatally over-rule a citizen 's right to be heard?

6) Will this Court impose exemplary damages upon the National Banks! Mortgage companies! Investors! attorneys! and their associates, who wrongfully strip, or move to strip, Homeowners to stop their Primary Residences through repeated reassignments and broken chains of title? (Frauds)

7) Following Wells Fargo- Bank 's-Hinlawful - Assignment, US Bank 's—wrongful- foreclosure sale was fraudulently predicated on a DOT from 2002, and ignored the 2008 QCD granting full ownership back to the husband as sole-purchaser (circa 1999). With the Broken Chain of Title, Will this court expunge such Transfers and Sales?
(FRAP 43(B); the Fourteenth Amendment; and U.S.C. § 1701j-3(d)(7), pre emptions of due on sale)

8) The refinance was on $ 274,000 of principal ($338K with costs, and offset with $32,000 cash, for a $306K refi); only the purchasing spouse made payments [totaling $ 379,619.74]; after the BK 7 discharge the foreclosure sale was for one penny over an inflated sale price of $ 539,455.59, and the only vested homeowner lost his home and every dollar invested since 1999. Will the practice of these violations of unjust enrichment; unclean hands! and undeserved impoverishment, be sharply rectified nationally?

9) How will the Supreme Court of the United States affirmatively end the lenders, and their accomplices, predatory schematic of mortgage and title fraud against homeowners?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-28
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent Stewart Title of Sacramento to respond filed.
2021-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-02
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. to respond filed.
2021-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2021)

Attorneys

Stewart Title of Sacramento
Robert H BakerStewart Title of Sacramento, Respondent
Vernon Deck
Vernon Deck — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Eric Donald HouserHouser & Allison, APC, Respondent