Sally Gaetjens v. City of Loves Park, Illinois, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the exigent circumstances doctrine extends to situations where there is time to obtain a warrant or other judicial process?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case squarely presents two important federal questions regarding the scope of the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARE: 1. Whether the exigent circumstances doctrine extends to situations where there is time to obtain a warrant or other judicial process? 2. Whether, under this Court’s emergency aid precedents, there can there be an objectively reasonable basis for a warrantless home entry where there is no specific evidence of serious injury or threat of such injury and where the only evidence regarding the individual’s location points elsewhere? ii PARTIES TO THE PETITION Petitioner e =6 Sally Gaetjens Respondents e City of Loves Park e Winnebago County e §=Doug Allton e = Philip Foley e Jennifer Stacy e Dave Kaske e Joshua Del Rio iii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Case No. 16 C 50261 Gaetjens v. City of Loves Park, et al. 5/2/2019 — Order granting summary judgment for all Defendants 5/3/2019 — Order modifying 5/2/2019 summary judgment order, entering summary judgment only in favor of the City of Loves Park, Philip Foley, and Doug Allton. 1/21/2020 — Order granting summary judgment for Defendants Winnebago County, Jennifer Stacy, Dave Kaske, and Joshua Del Rio. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Case No. 20-1295 Sally Gaetjens v. Winnebago County, Illinois, et al. 7/13/2021 — Final Judgment entered, affirming summary judgment for Defendants. 8/13/2021 — Entry of order denying petition for rehearing.