Whether the unrecognized transfer of a case from the Guam Superior Court to the Guam District Court, despite a lack of jurisdiction, led to a default judgment and levy on the petitioner's valuable properties, and whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals abused the petitioner in a discriminatory manner as a pro se litigant

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; Unrecognized Transfer The Case From Guam Superior Court To Guam District Court , even with lack of Jurisdiction lead To Default Judgement And Levi on Petitioner valuable Properties. ; And The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal Abuse ' Petitioner in Discriminatory manner as being Pro Se. IPetitioner Pursuant To Federal Question , Jurisdiction (Due ProcessEqual Protection Under the Law); Diversity Jurisdiction; Personal Jurisdiction (State of Domicile) and ; the disputed amount is over $75,000. IIPetitioner Pursuant to First Amendment, Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment IIIPetitioner Pursuant To Title 42 U.S Code & 1983 Appellant had been treated in discriminatory . manner as being Pro Se. : IVPetitioner Pursuant To Fraud Upon The Court And Fraud in the Court (North Carolina order . was a default Judgement entered without any judicial assessment or Trial on The Merit of the Action. This judgment wasn’t final, where N.C ; : rules and regulations guarded legal fees never , been followed nor Rule 54 (2). Appellee was . trying to enforcement in his favorite Court. V-Petitioner Pursuant To RookerFeldman Doctrine 1 VIPetitioner Pursuant To 28 U.S.C Section 1407, : Rule 42 (a) and 28 U.S.C Section 1404 (a) (For Consolidation and Transfer) . : ii