No. 21-1201

Michael D. Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process grand-jury judicial-misconduct jurisdiction prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-03-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Will the Eastern District of Kentucky be allowed to ignore our federal laws,Constitution and Bill of Rights and have a 5 week, mock trial on innocent people, filled with nothing but prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, forced the jury to vote guilty, after holding it for about 18 hours, after the grand jury returned a NO BILL OF INDICTMENT, the court had NO JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY to touch anyone, and sentence innocent people to prison for 10 years, to cover it all up, and refuse to give me justice and vacate my case and conviction

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Will the Eastern District of Kentucky be allowed to ignore our federal laws,Constitution and Bill of Rights and have a 5 week, mock trial on innocent people, filled with nothing but prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, forced the jury to vote guilty, after holding it for about 18 hours, after the grand jury returned a NO BILL OF INDICTMENT, the court had NO JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY to touch anyone, and sentence innocent people to prison for 10 years, to cover it all up, and refuse to give me justice and vacate my case and conviction. | | | 3 PETITIONFOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner Michael Smith respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the : | judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. ‘ DECISION FROM 6TH CIRCUIT USA v. Michael Smith, Case No. 3:08-cr-00031 Eastern District of Kentucky. Judgment entered March 29, 2021. USA v. Michael Smith, Case No. 21-5371, | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Judgment entered November 15, 2021. | ALSO FILED IN COURT RECENTLY Shena Smith (rd party claiment), my daughter filed a Writ of Mandamus in the Supreme Court, asking for the case to be vacated and her land returned to her, about January 14, 2022. That had nothing to do with this case, federal officials trying to 4 | |

Docket Entries

2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael Smith
Michael Smith — Petitioner
Michael Smith — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent