No. 21-1202

Michael D. Smith v. Frances Catron Cadle, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-power civil-rights constitutional-rights cover-up criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction government-liability judicial-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Will the government officials be allowed to violate federal-laws,constitution-and-bill-of-rights,prosecutorial-misconduct,judicial-misconduct,no-jurisdiction,impunity

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Will the government officials of the Eastern District of Kentucky and state officials be allowed to violate our federal laws,Constitution and Bill of Rights and have a 5 week, mock trial on innocent people, filled with nothing but prosecutorial and judicial misconduct, creating a crime that was not there, forced the jury to vote guilty, after holding it for about 18 hours, in a hot room, with a government agent on the jury, after the grand jury returned a NO BILL OF INDICTMENT, the court had NO JURISDICTION OR AUTHORITY to have a trial or touch anyone, and sentence innocent people to prison for 10 years, to cover it all up, and have complete impunity for their criminal actions. | 3 So eee PETITIONFOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner Michael Smith respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the. judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. Dismissing a civil lawsuit against . the United States, and government officials acting } under color of law who lied, mislead, and tried to | create a crime that was not there to send innocent people to prison. DECISION FROM 6TH CIRCUIT | Michael Smith v. Frances Catron Cadle, et al., | Case No. 3:21-008-DCR, Eastern District of | Kentucky. Judgment Dismissing, entered March 2, 2021. Rule 59 Alter, Amend or Vacate was DENIED March 30, 2021. Original criminal case was Eastern 4

Docket Entries

2022-04-25
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael D. Smith
Michael Smith — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent