No. 21-1207
Joel D. Klenck v. Liberty University, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: arbitrary-capricious
21-1206" arbitrary-capricious-standard congressional-representation constitutional-rights district-of-columbia final-judgments historic-preservation international-treaties judicial-review ministerial-duty state-court-review state-courts state-representation tenth-amendment terrorism terrorism-context Whether a federal court can dismiss a case for lac
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether and to what degree does this Court have the ability to review final judgments of state courts when the case involves international treaties regarding historic preservation and terrorism?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED , ; : : The questions presented are: | oe 1. Whether and to what degree does this Court | Bo, have the ability to review final judgments of state , a . courts when the case involves international treaties ; ; regarding historic preservation and terrorism? , 2. Whether and to what degree does this Court os define what is arbitrary and capricious to modify . final judgments of state courts? , | . | | | . | . | | | . | | | . : | . |
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent Liberty Univ., John Randall Price, Michael to respond filed.
2021-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Liberty Univ., John Randall Price, Michael
Rhonda B. Boggess — Marks Gray, P.A., Respondent
Rhonda B. Boggess — Marks Gray, P.A., Respondent