Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Tenth Circuit impermissibly expanded the judicially-created doctrine of qualified immunity to shield an officer where there is a substantial and material dispute in the evidence. 2. Whether the Tenth Circuit majority impermissibly usurped the role of the jury by resolving material factual disputes in favor of the moving party on a motion for summary judgment. 3. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in holding that an officer is entitled to qualified immunity on summary judgment where there is a genuine dispute of fact as to whether his use of excessive force was the result of his own reckless or deliberate actions.
2022-09-14
Reply of petitioners The Estate of Dillon Taylor, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-29
Brief of respondents Salt Lake City, Utah, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-05-18
Record received from the U.S.D.C. for the District of Utah (1 CD containing District Court Document No. 72). The remaining record is available on PACER.
2022-05-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 1, 2022.
2022-05-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2022 to August 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-05
Record received from the U.S.C.A. for the 10th Circuit (1 flash drive containing District Court Document No. 71). The remaining record is available on PACER.
2022-05-02
Response Requested. (Due June 1, 2022)
2022-04-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 8, 2022)