Whether the court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case, given the challenges to jurisdiction raised by the petitioner

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Harassed for years, challenging subject matter jurisdiction was relevant; causation of breach of , duty, tort, and trespassing without subject matter jurisdiction itself is simply frivolous matter. Jurisdiction challenged every proceedings turns into ; contempt court, harassment, threats, and abusive conviction. Accused of committing crime driving freely on public roads with SUSPENDED DRIVER LICENCE (DL contract never existed). Once the ID was out of contract, state of MN has no entitlement, the contract expire then. The individuals’ enter purposely, engaged in conduct that causes injury and damages. INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR OWN CAPACITY violated my rights given by GOD knowingly, diligently, purposely, wrongfully injured me with prejudice. . “The lord should judge the people with equity.” Psalm 98:9 Administrative government courts, a contract is need ; it to be in place before that court can compel. Existed NONE! "Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proved." Hagans v. Levine, 415 U.S. 533, n. 3. e Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statutes at Large? e Ifis not subject matter jurisdiction, aren’t you in violation of the federal law? Federal Constitution P.319US 113 II e Iclaim that I’m not member of the government fiction law nor associate, I am flesh and blood man, could you verify personam jurisdictions over me, did you have subject matter jurisdiction? e Ifyou have financial interest, and you are on record not having subject matter jurisdiction, continuing to proceed isn’t a violation of constitutional rights under 42 US codes 1983, 1985, 1986 you can sue everyone, year 1982 reports remove judicial immunity for violating someone’s rights. When the judge is involved in a scheme of bribery (conflict of interest); the Alemann cases, Bracey v. Warden, U.S. Supreme Court No. 966133; June 9, 1997). e Administrative Commercial courts to be dysfunctional when Duo Process ignored, and law of the land imperil when Chief of Justice Douglas B Meslow and bench judge at that time Ted V. Jude telling you, “you can’t use law ; here, any statement of the law differs from the law I give you discard it” as I was instructed to follow their “rules” in an abusive trial? The individuals are liable for punitive money _ damages When a judge acts intentionally and knowingly to deprive a person of his constitutional rights he exercises no discretion or individual : judgment; he acts no longer as a judge, but as a" minister" of his own prejudices. [886 U.S. 547, 568]; TORT! Is it in Conflict with the Supreme Ill law of the land Art VI paragraph 2?. Murduch v other purposethanto . chill assertation of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them it is unconstitutional. In cases where a law conflicted with the Constitution, Marshal wrote, then,” The very essence of judicial duty” was to followthe v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that, "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. e Ifa political member of this fictional law harms you in these administrative commercial courts without following the exact course of the LAW, this constitutes a DUE PROCESS violation; does it offend the rule of law? US code sec 556D clear is says if they deny you Due Process of law, all jurisdiction ceases automatically. 557D, and sec 706 of that code if you can prove they deny you, you can say, they might have jurisdiction, but they lost it when they deny Due Process. Any ruling which involves a violation of due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth, or Seventh Amendments is also a void judgment. A violation of due process: Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, IV . e Do you consider it