Did the US. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit err by failing to apply the 'appreciable number of consumers' standard to the 'likelihood of confusion' test for a claim brought under the Lanham Act and how this bad and conflicting precedent negatively impacts trademark law in general?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Did the US. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit err by failing to apply the “appreciable number of consumers” standard to the “likelihood of confusion” test for a claim brought under the Lanham Act and how this bad and conflicting precedent negatively impacts trademark law in general? 2. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit err by failing to find truth to be an absolute defense to a claim brought under a non-disparagement provision of a severance agreement and how this bad and conflicting precedent negatively impacts business law in general? | . . ii | STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES | Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc. et al., 06-cv-00670, US. District Court for the District of Columbia. Judgment entered March 15, 2018. . Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc. et al., 19-7105, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. | Judgment entered on September 15, 2021. | | a