Did the Court of Appeals err in finding that the petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his right of appeal

QUESTION PRESENTED ‘Did the Court of Appeals err in finding that the petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his right of appeal without having considered the existence, nature and extent of the Rule 11 colloquy and did the court of appeals err in determining the scope of the appeal which the petitioner had waived including his : right to appeal that part of the sentencing which exceeded the guidelines and that part of the sentencing which established the offense level? | | . | | ! | . | 1 i | | | : i | . | ; ii . LIST OF PROCEEDINGS This is a petition for two cases which were consolidated for sentencing and appeal. The cases were identified as 20-4621 and 20-4621(L) in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. ; The cases were identified in the United States District Court as PJM 00-0605 and PJM 00-0373 and were consolidated on January 24, 2001. This petition is for . r cases. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Nos. 20-4621, 20-4621(L) , United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abetubokun A. Adesioye, Defendant-Appellant Date of Final Judgment: December 16, 2021 | United States District Court, District of Maryland : Nos. PJM-8-00-CR-00373, United States of America v. Abetubokun A. Adesioye Date of Final Order: December 15, 2020 | | | | . iii