No. 21-1292
S. Baxter Jones v. City of Detroit, Michigan
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination public-entity rehabilitation-act respondeat-superior standing vicarious-liability
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether public entities can be vicariously liable for ADA-Title-II-violations
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a public entity can be vicariously liable under a theory of respondeat superior for its employees’ violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq., or the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-14
Reply of petitioner S. Baxter Jones filed. (Distributed)
2022-06-01
Brief of respondent City of Detroit, Michigan in opposition filed.
2022-05-02
Response Requested. (Due June 1, 2022)
2022-04-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent City of Detroit, Michigan to respond filed.
2022-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2022)
Attorneys
City of Detroit, Michigan
Cheryl Lee Ronk — City of Detroit Law Department, Respondent
Cheryl Lee Ronk — City of Detroit Law Department, Respondent
S. Baxter Jones
Gerard V. Mantese — Mantese Honigman, PC, Petitioner
Gerard V. Mantese — Mantese Honigman, PC, Petitioner