Does the district court have the right to adjudicate an intellectual-property case without addressing parties' pleas, disregarding legal precedence of intellectual-property-law, ownership, service-mark, trademark, use-in-commerce

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Does the district court have the right to adjudicate an | intellectual property case without addressing parties’ pleas, disregarding legal precedence of intellectual property law as to ownership, or type of mark mentioned in original complaint relief, or use in . commerce to specifically, a Servicemark, not a Trademark as district judge assumed? 2. Did the district court violate this petitioner's | constitutional rights by cancellation of petitioners registrations at state, and federal levels of service marks, and trademarks without proper due process of | law, or takings clause consideration, and then | redistribution of same property to defendants with | unproven use and ownership rights of same | . defendants service business? 3. Does the district court have the right to deny a 28 ; U.S.C. § 144 motion to recuse the district judge ; . | without due cause, when the statute statement is that | “each party has a right to one such action”? | 4. Can the district court ignore a FRCP rule 55 (a) that : was stamped received by the court prior to reply of defendants, and even without vacating the default . request to clerk affidavit to enter default was received deny that default? | | | | | | ee