No. 21-1306
Stacy Penning v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 42-U.S.C.-1983 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fair-share-fees good-faith-defense janus-v-afscme public-sector-unions retroactive-effect retroactivity
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the proper remedy for the collection of an illegal fee is refund or restitution, regardless of the purported good faith of the fee collector.
2. Whether this Court's application of a rule of federal law to the parties before it requires every court to give retroactive effect to that decision.
3. Whether 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides a good-faith defense for private entities who violate private rights if the private entities acted under color of a law before it was held unconstitutional.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the proper remedy for the collection of an illegal fee is refund or restitution, regardless of the purported good faith of the fee collector
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1021, et al. to respond filed.
2022-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)
2022-01-14
Application (21A326) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 25, 2022.
2022-01-11
Application (21A326) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 24, 2022 to March 25, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Service Employees International Union Local 1021, et al.
Scott A. Kronland — Altshuler Berzon, LLP, Respondent
Stacy Penning
John J. Bursch — Bursch Law PLLC, Petitioner