1. Does this Country contribute to Court Bias, Violations of Due Process and Constitutional Rights, and Discrimination in courts by consciously ignoring the utilization of technicalities, manipulation of weaknesses in the eFile system, failing to address Pro-se discrimination, and refusing to create strict, accountable guidelines against court official corruptive actions that can protect the people of this great country instead of creating victims of the courts? Should all court officials be held liable for allowing the abuse and manipulation of a vulnerable-victim, especially in a legal malpractice against one of their own, similar to criminal charges regarding vulnerable-victims? (Murphy, 202\){USA v. Jeffrey L. Goldberg, 406 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2005).

2. Should the US Supreme Court take steps to universally protect the discriminated and suppressed class of Pro-se who come to the courts as a final reprieve for aid in times of duress, only to be forced to compete on "EQUAL " terms with the highly entitled and elitist "Fraternity " of lawyers capable of manipulating technicalities and eFile, and enlist "buddy "s" to prejudice a Pro-se towards the inevitable outcome of loss of time, money, property, and more to pursue a case doomed to fail as courts prejudice Pro-se? When is the time for Pro-se to demand EQUITY?

Does this Country contribute to Court Bias, Violations of Due Process and Constitutional Rights, and Discrimination in courts by consciously ignoring the utilization of technicalities, manipulation of weaknesses in the eFile system, failing to address Pro-se discrimination, and refusing to create strict, accountable guidelines against court official corruptive actions that can protect the people of this great country instead of creating victims of the courts?