No. 21-1320
Robert Campo, et al. v. Department of Justice, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-precedent court-interpretation evidence-rules federal-rules-of-evidence federal-rules-of-procedure freedom-of-information-act judicial-discretion judicial-review procedural-rules supreme-court-precedent u.s-constitution
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal judges are free to flout and violate FOIA, federal rules, the Constitution, and Supreme Court precedent in FOIA adjudications
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, in adjudications under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), federal judges are free to flout and knowingly violate FOIA, federal rules of procedure and evidence, the U.S. Constitution and this Court’s precedent. ii DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-04
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2022-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2022)
2022-01-27
Application (21A358) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 1, 2022.
2022-01-21
Application (21A358) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 31, 2022 to April 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Department of Justice, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Robert Campo, et al.
Jack Revels Tucker Jordan — Jack Jordan, Petitioner